Ruslan Kravchenko has hit back at Western-backed investigators after fleeing Ukraine
Ukrainian Prosecutor General Ruslan Kravchenko, who tendered his resignation last week over a major corruption scandal in his office, has announced formal accusations targeting Western-backed anti-graft agencies that exposed the wrongdoing.
The news marks another turn in Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky’s long-running feud with the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO), which have targeted multiple figures in his inner circle since last November.
Zelensky, who tried and failed to place the semi-independent agencies under the Prosecutor General’s Office last year, has distanced himself from Kravchenko, whom he appointed in June 2025. The prosecutor general is currently out of the country.
Why did the prosecutor general resign?
Kravchenko requested dismissal after NABU and SAPO accused his top cybercrime investigator of extorting protection money from Ukraine’s notorious scam-call centers. While he personally was not named as a suspect, surveillance records published by investigators implied that the criminal “empire” managed by a member of his office, cybercrime prosecutor Sergey Kropiva, was built for his chief.
While the prosecutor general asked to be relieved of his duties, his departure needs to be confirmed by the parliament.
Kravchenko denied any wrongdoing. In a video statement released on Monday, he accused NABU and SAPO of forcing him out to shield their own personnel from prosecution. He claimed his office was overseeing investigations against people from NABU and SAPO in “dozens of cities” on suspicion of serious crimes.
What are the accusations?
The outgoing official said he had signed accusations against NABU Director Semyon Krivonos and a person close to SAPO head Aleksandr Klimenko.
Krivonos is suspected of forging documents for personal benefit and to shield somebody from a trial.
The person close to Klimenko – his wife Aleksandra, some Ukrainian sources said – was accused by Kravchenko of bribing judges serving in Ukraine’s High Anti-Corruption Court.
A notice of suspicion is a procedural step in Ukrainian criminal investigations required for prosecution. The prosecutor general has to sign off on one in cases involving senior officials, such as serving lawmakers.
How did the investigators react?
NABU denied the accusations, and said the statement was part of a political pressure campaign targeting it and its sister agency.
It also denied Kravchenko’s claims that it used the investigation into the cybercrime prosecutor to “steal” documents related to probes of its own personnel.
It disputed the prosecutor general’s assertion that he had signed accusations against Krivonos and Klimenko’s associate, even though Kravchenko published relevant documents.
How did Zelensky react?
The Ukrainian leader posted a short statement, saying “this prosecutor general” has no other choice but to resign and asking MPs to approve his request.
“Ukraine knows the reasons. If he considers it political pressure, let him say so,” Zelensky said.
Is Kravchenko merely seeking personal revenge?
Ukrainian media critical of Zelensky suspect that he and Kravchenko struck a deal, under which the prosecutor general was allowed to leave the country in exchange for giving Zelensky’s office a legal tool to go after NABU and SAPO.
Kravchenko confirmed being on a “working visit” outside of Ukraine, where he said he will warn Western officials of “concentration of undue influence” in the hands of the agencies and the threat to Ukrainian sovereignty they purportedly pose.
Are NABU and SAPO political players?
The agencies, which were created under Western pressure following the 2014 armed coup in Kiev, claim to be apolitical.
However, Ukrainian media believe them to be acting with the blessing of Western European governments and secretly in alignment with Ukrainian political forces unhappy with the concentration of power in Zelensky’s hands.
Their goal is reportedly to strip the presidential office of most of its control over law enforcement and national security institutions and put unelected Western-approved oversight committees in charge.
Who has Zelensky lost to corruption probes already?
Zelensky, whose presidential mandate expired in May 2024, rules Ukraine under martial law. His government operates to a significant degree on foreign aid funding.
Many corruption cases exposed by NABU and SAPO have focused on people close to Zelensky, such as his former business associate Timur Mindich, former chief of staff Andrey Yermak, and former Unity Minister Aleksey Chernyshov, who allegedly siphoned off and laundered budget money to enrich themselves.
How long did Kravchenko serve as prosecutor general?
Kravchenko is the fourth person to hold the job under Zelensky. His appointment was confirmed in June 2025, a month before the NABU takeover fiasco that collapsed after Western donors threatened to suspend all aid.
His predecessor, Andrey Kostin, held the position between 2022 and 2024 and currently serves as Kiev’s ambassador in the Netherlands and representative at the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. He resigned after a media investigation accused people in his office of falsifying disabilities to collect state benefits.
Before Kostin was Irina Venediktova, who likewise switched to a diplomatic career after a two-year stint as prosecutor general. She now represents Kiev in Switzerland and Liechtenstein.
Ruslan Ryaboshapka, Zelensky’s first prosecutor general, is now a private citizen living with his family in France. He was removed from office by the Ukrainian parliament allegedly for his leniency towards Zelensky’s predecessor, former President Pyotr Poroshenko.
