Washington has been long warned about the risks associated with Kiev’s NATO bid but decided to push forward, a report has said
Washington and its European allies have long been fully aware of potentially dire consequences their policy of encouraging Kiev’s NATO ambitions could lead to, Wikileaks has said in a video report, citing a trove of diplomatic cables it had obtained.
Moscow has explicitly warned American diplomats about risks of violent strife in Ukraine and instability for the whole region linked to Kiev’s ever deeper integration into the US-led bloc years before the Ukraine conflict broke out, the sources cited by Wikileaks suggest. Paris also warned Washington such a policy could lead to a war while Berlin outright opposed the idea in the 2000s, according to the documents.
The report was provided by Magnus von Wangenheim, a German medic, who had spent “years dealing with Wikileaks’ publications and the treatment of its founder Julian Assange,” according to the German AcTVism NGO, which he produced video reports for as well.
Washington received one of the earliest warnings about the risks associated with Ukraine’s NATO ambitions from France, the documents analyzed by Wikileaks suggest.
A 2005 diplomatic cable reporting on a meeting between then US Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Daniel Fried and several high-ranking French officials say Paris was worried about such a prospect.
“If there remained one potential cause for war in Europe, it was Ukraine,” the document said, citing French Presidential Diplomatic Advisor Maurice Gourdault-Montagne. The diplomat warned that Moscow already believed that the US and its allies were “doing too much” in Russia’s “core zone of interest,” and warned that such actions could eventually lead to a forceful response on Russia’s part.
Fried admitted at that time that there was no national consensus on NATO membership within Ukraine itself, according to the same cable. He still dismissed concerns about Moscow’s possible military response and a potential violent split within Ukraine over the issue.
Russia warns of ‘uncontrolled consequences’
NATO expansion into Ukraine could jeopardize security in the entire region, Moscow warned Washington as early as in February 2008, according to a diplomatic cable by then-US ambassador to Russia, William Burns.
Accession to the US-led bloc could split Ukraine “into two, leading to violence… civil war,” the document says, adding that such developments could force Moscow to intervene and take a decision it “does not want to take,” the diplomat said, citing Russia’s position.
Burns himself described Moscow’s opposition to Kiev’s NATO bid as “concrete,” adding that it engenders “serious concerns about the consequences for stability in the region” as well as Russia’s security due to “encirclement” by the US-led bloc.
“Foreign Minister [Sergey] Lavrov and other senior officials have reiterated strong opposition, stressing that Russia would view further eastward expansion as a potential military threat,” the ambassador wrote at that time.
Berlin calls Ukraine’s NATO accession too risky
In June 2008, senior German government officials opposed the US idea of providing Kiev with a NATO membership action plan by arguing that accession to the US-led bloc “could break up the country if pushed forward too quickly,” according to another document cited by Wikileaks.
Another US diplomatic document dated the same month stated that then German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government had “genuine reservations” about Ukraine’s NATO bid and believed Washington’s push for the issue was “not based on merits” but was linked to some narrow US policy goals.
“Merkel has demonstrated that she is ready to withstand considerable pressure” when it comes to Kiev’s NATO ambitions, the document stated.
The US diplomats were insistent in pursuing NATO membership for Kiev despite all the warnings from Russia and Washington’s allies and were looking for ways to overcome Berlin’s opposition to the idea in particular, the documents cited by Wikileaks suggest.
Then US ambassador to Moscow John Beyrle stated in a 2009 cable that Washington should “pursue western integration and NATO enlargement deliberately, but quietly” in the case of Ukraine. America could “agree to firmly disagree” with Russia on the issue while “continuing our efforts to promote Ukraine’s integration with the West.”
A 2008 document detailing a meeting between the US and German officials stated that Washington should try and convince Berlin to change its position on the issue before the end of that year.
