There’s an irony of fate as the old rivals again look for common ground
For years, Russian-American relations seemed to be in an irreversible coma. Diplomacy was dead, overtaken by hostility, sanctions, and a growing risk of military confrontation. Many insisted that nothing could break this trajectory — Moscow and the Washington were locked into an unchangeable course of conflict.
Yet today, the pace of change is astonishing. The recent high-level meeting between Russian and American officials in Riyadh, followed by Donald Trump’s latest statements, suggests that nothing in geopolitics is predetermined.
This turn of events brings to mind an iconic scene from Terminator 2, in which Sarah Connor carves “No fate” into a wooden table. Her son, John, expands on the thought: “There is no fate except the one we make for ourselves.” The message is clear — our future is shaped by choices, not by destiny.
For years, analysts and politicians in both Russia and the West insisted that the US-Russia standoff was inevitable. Some American strategists viewed Russia as an irredeemable adversary, while Russia’s “turbo-patriots” warned that any engagement with Washington would be a trap. The more extreme voices on both sides even suggested that the confrontation could only end in nuclear catastrophe.
But the events unfolding now suggest otherwise. If there is no fate but what we make, then the choices before Moscow and Washington today are of historic significance.
The Illusion of a Monolithic West
The Riyadh talks have already begun to dismantle long-standing assumptions about the supposed unity of the “collective West.” For years, Russian policymakers believed that global politics were controlled by a single, centralized “Anglo-American” power structure, operating seamlessly from Washington to Brussels. The reality, as the Trump era has repeatedly demonstrated, is far more fragmented.
Trump’s America is not Joe Biden’s America. Even within Washington, deep divisions are evident. Meanwhile, Western Europe — long assumed to be unwaveringly aligned with the US — now finds itself struggling with internal disagreements and resentment over American pressure.
For Russia, this fragmentation is an opportunity. The unraveling of transatlantic consensus presents openings that did not exist even a year ago.
Compromise vs. Capitulation
Of course, skepticism remains. Critics will argue that any agreement with Washington is a trap — that the US will make grand promises only to renege on them later, as it has in the past. That once Russia lets its guard down, the West will revert to its old habits of betrayal and broken deals.
This is not an unfounded concern. History has taught Russia to be cautious. But diplomacy is not about guarantees — it is about opportunities. There is no such thing as an ironclad agreement in geopolitics. Every deal can be broken, every promise can be reversed. The real question is whether Russia is prepared to seize the moment when a rare opportunity presents itself.
And this moment may be precisely that.
Even if Trump’s envoys — Marco Rubio, Mike Waltz, and Steve Witkoff — are skilled negotiators, it is difficult to imagine that they possess a superior grasp of diplomacy than figures like Sergey Lavrov or Yury Ushakov. Russia has experienced diplomats who have spent decades navigating the complexities of global power politics. If the US team believes it can outmaneuver Moscow, it is sorely mistaken.
A Moment of Historic Opportunity
The road ahead is uncertain, and there will be voices insisting that Russia should reject any engagement with Washington outright. But refusing to negotiate out of fear would be a mistake. Russia is not in the position it was in the 1990s — it is stronger, more self-sufficient, and recognized as a global power. This time, Moscow enters negotiations not as a supplicant but as an equal.
Opportunities in diplomacy are rare. It is easy to let them slip away; far harder to seize them. If Russia and the US can move toward a reasonable compromise — one that secures Moscow’s core interests while de-escalating tensions — it may be the moment that reshapes the geopolitical landscape for years to come.
There is no fate — only the choices we make.
This article was first published by Kommersant, and was translated and edited by the RT team.
