Leave it to a German to get EU-Europe properly encircled
As a historian who also happens to be German, that was my spontaneous reaction to Ursula von der Leyen’s annual grand – and always grandiloquent – “state of the union” address to the European Parliament in Strasbourg.
It’s not really a “union,” of course, and not really a “parliament,” either: technically, the EU is a confederation messed up by the ideological construct of “supranationalism”; and the parliament has no independent legislative power, but let’s not dwell on the obvious.
At the head of her Commission (read: over-reaching Central Committee) of career bureaucrats, von der Leyen is the unelected de-facto leader and personification of the Frankenstein wanna-be-super-state that has long gobbled up idealistic dreams of European unity.
Once, those dreams may have been about democracy, sovereign equality, prosperity for all, and peace. But real-existing EU-Europe is very different: the European dream has come true as a nightmare, dominated by a smug and self-empowered globalist establishment, thoroughly insulated from popular participation, economically stagnant and crisis-prone, as well as unequal, and ever more militarist.
When von der Leyen boasted that, in effect during her tenure, EU-Europe had become “stronger” and “more independent,” while “securing its prosperity” and increasing armament spending “by 80% in the last five years alone,” only the last point bore any resemblance to reality, as the preponderant majority of the over 450 million EU citizens – really subjects – experience it.
But there is no misery a Eurocrat worth her (or his!) salt cannot make worse. Now von der Leyen seems hellbent to take the worst of bad old German traditions to a whole new, all-EU level. As is well-known from the history of the last two world wars, Germany not once but twice first deftly maneuvered itself into being surrounded by (mostly) enemies and then lost, the first time crushingly, the second one even worse, in fact so badly it took a short half-century (and much Russian good will, as it happens) to put the country together again.
The Kaiser’s Germany and the Fuhrer’s were – to be fair even to the Kaiser – quite different, but what their establishments had in common was a bad case of Germanophrenia, a relative of the contemporary Russophrenia syndrome: The core delusion of Russophrenia, as it is now ravaging Western minds, is to hallucinate Russia as on the verge of collapse and of conquering the world at the same time. Those afflicted by Germanophrenia believed Germany was in existential danger but also capable of taking on Europe at least and, if need be, the world, too.
Enter the all-EU version, compliments of the very, very German von der Leyen. Quoting Charles Dickens’ already much overused “it was the best of times, it was the worst of times” line in her impeccably Germanic version of English, von der Leyen proceeded to do two things: assert that the EU is at peak strength and, at the same time, as precarious as ever. Clearly aware that sane listeners would find that combination of claims extremely counter-intuitive, she insisted that even if they “may seem incompatible,” they are still both true. Orwell for beginners really: two plus two is five, if Big Sister from the Commission says so.
Inducing debilitating cognitive dissonance, though, is the least of von der Leyen’s powers. The real payload of her rambling speech was her combative declaration of if not war then defiance against, in essence, almost everyone who matters on planet Earth.
In true paranoid fashion, von der Leyen first declared that the EU faced a “hostile world,” no less. Then, she got more specific: Russia – surprise, surprise – led her enemy list; and she congratulated, in effect, herself for ridding the EU of a “toxic” dependence on its fossil fuels. What a way to describe cutting yourself off from a reliable and comparatively inexpensive energy source to shift to exorbitant prices and uncertain delivery from, for instance, the unpredictable US and the war-torn and blockade-prone Middle East!
She had tough words and warnings for China as well. Those clearly must be seen in the context of ongoing EU attempts to play trade hardball with Beijing. Desperate to make up for the badly declining competitiveness of European industry and currently especially carmakers, the old continent – once happily exploiting the rest of the world for its own gain – has discovered what von der Leyen and her officials think of as fairness.
But throwing down the gauntlet to China and Russia – the core of the emerging multipolar order – was not enough for von der Leyen in attack-mode. Surprisingly, the same woman who almost literally kissed Donald Trump’s feet at Turnberry, delivering a full, unconditional trade war capitulation – so much, by the way, for her claim that the EU is “the greatest trading power on the planet” – loaded her speech with barely concealed challenges to the US. That is, the much diminished but still regrettably powerful center of the old West, as well as the state on which the EU is, of course, toxically dependent in reality.
The single most aggressive of von der Leyen’s sallies against Washington was her bizarre call for giving Canada “associate membership,” a status that does not even exist under the EU treaties, would need the very unlikely agreement of all 27 member governments, and makes no sense geographically or geopolitically.
But then again, von der Leyen’s real motive in suggesting a Canadian-EU play that cannot be but against US interests may be something else entirely. In true von der Leyen spirit, the EU has recently made much noise about claiming interests and, quite simply, a say, in the Arctic. That makes fairly little sense except you count Greenland as “Danish,” which it is formally but hardly in reality. Not to speak of the well-known US ambitions to take it over in one way or the other. Some creative minds may have discovered that adding Canada’s northern coastlines would help make Arctic ambitions more plausible.
And that in turn may very well also explain the speed and ferocity of the US response. In other words, the challenge to Washington may be even worse than “merely” offering Canada a counterweight against traditional and entrenched US hegemony. If the Arctic is the real target, the stakes could not be higher. Way to go, Ursula: your EU against everyone at once. Some of your German ancestors would have been so proud.
