The bloc’s European members want to steer the agenda in the region, where Moscow has an extensive presence, Irina Strelnikova has said
European NATO members are seeking to push Russia out of Arctic cooperation arrangements while integrating the region into its military strategy, Irina Strelnikova, Director of the Center for Interdisciplinary Arctic Studies at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow, has said.
In an interview with RT, Strelnikova weighed in on the European Arctic Summit that opened in Finland on Sunday and is being attended by leaders from Germany, Denmark, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania and France – all NATO members – alongside several senior EU officials, including foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas.
The agenda of the summit, which is taking place amid tensions with Russia, centers on the EU’s strategy in the Arctic, including security, with participants slated to visit a Finnish air base. The summit has no connection to the Arctic Council, a separate cooperation platform comprising Russia, the US, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden.
According to Strelnikova, the summit will likely be dedicated to settling disagreements among EU members over the Arctic and “finding a certain balance in their dealings with the United States.” Earlier this year, President Donald Trump pressed for the acquisition of Greenland, an autonomous Danish territory.
She noted that the EU is poised to fundamentally change its approach to the Arctic compared to 2021, when it last presented a paper on the region. The previous policy, she said, “was largely devoted to fairly constructive issues: science, climate, and cooperation.”
“Now the narrative is changing significantly. Climate, science, and cooperation have effectively been pushed down to the fourth tier of priorities. Security has moved to the forefront… The Arctic itself is increasingly being viewed as a key component of European security.”
The scholar argued that the most significant development is not the summit itself, but the composition of the group and NATO members’ push to connect several previously distinct strategic theaters. “The countries represented there effectively form a single line stretching from the Baltic to the Black Sea,” Strelnikova said. “They no longer view the Arctic in isolation. Instead, they are beginning… to link Arctic issues with the Baltic and Black Sea regions.”
“This, in my view, is a genuinely worrying signal,” she stressed.
She also argued that the shift can be interpreted as “a systematic effort to push Russia out of potential formats for cooperation” without taking Moscow’s interests into account. “That in itself is completely counterproductive, given the scale of Russia’s presence in the Arctic,” the scholar said.
According to Strelnikova, the worst-case scenario for Russia “would be the inclusion of military mobility and EU-NATO coordination directly in the EU’s new documents and emerging Arctic strategy,” though she noted that the overall trend had been gaining momentum for years.
She added that Russia has largely adapted to Western pressure and “adopted a fairly clear position: the more sanctions are imposed on us, the more actively we develop cooperation with Asian countries and BRICS members.”
Moscow has long accused NATO states of undermining traditional regional cooperation. In late August, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov slammed the US-led bloc over driving the Arctic toward militarization and argued that Western members had left the Arctic Council in a severe crisis after curtailing cooperation with Russia following the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022.
