Published: November 21, 2025 2:16 am
Author: RT
The ruling on publishers’ claims against the tech giant’s ads business found the company violated both competition and privacy rules
Spain has imposed a major penalty on US social-media giant Meta Platforms after finding the company gained an unlawful advantage through its data practices. The decision follows a long-running dispute involving over 80 digital media outlets who accused the Facebook parent company of exploiting its position in the online-advertising market.
AMI, the association representing the outlets, sued in 2023, arguing that Meta’s ad practices between May 2018 and July 2023 breached competition and privacy rules by giving the company an unfair data-driven advantage.
On Thursday, a commercial court in Madrid ordered the company to pay the €479 million (around $550 million) in compensation, finding that it had processed data from Facebook and Instagram users for behavioural advertising without complying with competition or data‑protection safeguards. AMI said the ruling could set a precedent for similar cases, including one underway in France.
According to Associated Press, the judges said Meta’s “illicit treatment of this enormous quantity of personal data” gave it a competitive edge that domestic outlets “could not match.”
READ MORE: EU orders Meta to pay $800mn fine
The court also noted that Meta returned to a user‑consent basis in August 2023 and estimated the company generated at least €5.3 billion (around $5.7 billion) in ad revenue over the period in question.
Meta rejected the decision and said it would appeal, calling the case “baseless” and arguing there is “no evidence of alleged harm” to publishers. The company said the ruling misrepresents how the digital-advertising industry operates.
The ruling adds to a broader clash between EU regulators and Big Tech platforms over digital competition. Last year, the European Commission fined Meta nearly €800 million (around $870 million) over practices linked to Facebook Marketplace, and earlier this year regulators accused the company of breaching the bloc’s Digital Markets Act with a “pay or consent” advertising model that required users to accept ads or pay a subscription fee.
