The age of Western moralising is over — the world is now truly multipolar
Every October, the Valdai Discussion Club gathers as a kind of intellectual weather vane for global politics. This year’s 22nd session, titled: ‘The Polycentric World: Instructions for Use’, felt less like a debate than a diagnosis – the world has crossed a threshold. Multipolarity is no longer an emerging idea; it is the reality we inhabit.
The leitmotif of Valdai 2025 came from President Vladimir Putin himself, in words directed toward Western Europe: “Calm down, sleep peacefully, and deal with your own problems.” It was both a rebuke and a reminder – that the age of blaming Moscow for every domestic failure should be over, and that the real crises of the West lie within.
For years, Valdai was seen as an intermezzo – a pause between acts in the great geopolitical performance. That illusion is gone. The ‘polycentric world’ has ceased to be a hypothesis. There will be no return to unipolarity, no revival of Western tutelage over global affairs. The emerging order may still be turbulent and uncertain, but it is now the order – fluid, competitive, and irreversible.
Putin’s address captured this new mood. His message was pragmatic, even philosophical: The world’s problems are too grave to waste energy on fabricated conflicts and imaginary threats. “There are so many objective problems – natural, technological, social – that expending energy on artificial contradictions is impermissible, wasteful, and simply foolish,” he said.
This is less about ideology than survival. In an age of cascading crises – climate shocks, economic dislocation, wars of information and infrastructure – the call is for sobriety. And it is Western Europeans, more than anyone, that seem in need of it.
The West looks inward – but too late
Putin’s remarks to the Western Europeans was not mere trolling; it was diagnostic. The region, once confident in its civilizational mission, now frets about Moscow’s ‘hand’ in everything from elections to farm protests. The paranoia betrays insecurity – a subconscious awareness that the region’s problems are largely homemade: Demographic decline, deindustrialization, energy dependence, and political exhaustion.
Russia has moved on from this drama. The Kremlin no longer seeks Western validation or fears Western reproach. The conversation has shifted toward Asia, the Global South, and ‘the rest of the nations’ now forming their own centers of gravity. The world has ceased revolving around Washington and Brussels.
This year’s Valdai theme – Instructions for Use – was not a metaphor for a machine but a manual for coexistence in the new age. The task, as framed by the conference, is no longer to restore order but to navigate disorder – systematically, without panic or dogma. As Putin noted, we are entering “a long period of searching, often moving by trial and error.” This search must be guided, not chaotic.
What distinguishes Valdai from Western forums like Davos or Munich is precisely this realism. There is no pretense of a moral monopoly, no talk of ‘the rules-based order’. Instead, it accepts that no single civilization, not even Western civilization which long dominated, holds the key to the 21st century. The old map no longer fits the terrain.
A broader conversation
Another notable shift is the composition of the forum itself. The Valdai meetings once felt like a polite duel between Russia and the West. Today, that dynamic has vanished. Delegates from Asia, Africa, and Latin America now fill the halls, and their concerns – from technological sovereignty to food security – are treated as central, not peripheral. The ‘global majority’ is no longer an audience; it is the chorus.
Even the word ‘inclusivity’, now derided in Western bureaucracies, finds genuine meaning here – not as a slogan, but as a structure. The same week that the Pentagon banned the term, Moscow practiced it in earnest.
The West’s ideological fervor – its need to moralize every conflict – has become its weakness. Russia’s stance, by contrast, is pragmatic, even stoic: The recognition that the world is too complex for binary thinking, that each civilization must now define its own path.
In this, the Valdai Forum has become less an echo chamber for Russian policy than a mirror for the shifting global psyche. The world’s leading powers, both old and rising, are groping toward a balance – one defined not by domination, but by coexistence. The new era, messy and multipolar, may yet be freer. If only the old empires can learn to calm down.
