Multiple media reports suggested the policy was scrapped just two days after it was introduced
The White House has denied multiple media reports that it had revised its decision to freeze federal grants and loans, insisting that the order remains standing.
Multiple media reports on Wednesday suggested the halt on federal assistance had been dropped, with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) purportedly circulating a memo on the matter among federal agencies and executive departments. The White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt took to X (formerly Twitter) to deny the news, explaining only an OMB memo on the matter was rescinded in the wake of legal challenges the order has faced.
“This is NOT a rescission of the federal funding freeze. It is simply a rescission of the OMB memo,” Leavitt wrote. “The President’s EO’s on federal funding remain in full force and effect, and will be rigorously implemented.”
The confusion was likely triggered by a statement from Democracy Forward, one of the NGOs that spearheaded the legal challenge against the freeze. The new memo circulated by the OMB now instructs the heads of agencies and executive departments to contact their general counsels should they “have questions about implementing the President’s Executive Orders,” the NGO said, interpreting it, however, as a rescission of the policy altogether.
“Facing legal pressure from our clients and in the wake of a federal judge ruling in our case last evening, the Trump-Vance administration has abandoned OMB’s ordered federal funding freeze,” Democracy Forward said in a statement, apparently prematurely hailing the development as a major victory.
The NGO’s take on the memo was further reinforced by multiple media reports citing allegedly informed sources that claimed the federal funding freeze had indeed been scrapped.
The order, issued on Monday, instructed federal agencies to “temporarily pause all activities related to obligations or disbursement of all federal financial assistance.” The move sparked chaos and prompted widespread concerns over the fate of various crucial programs, including funding of schools, housing for low-income families and so on.
The move faced immediate legal challenges from various groups, with a federal judge temporarily blocking the effort on Tuesday. The confusion prompted the White House to elaborate, with the administration stating that “any program that provides direct benefits to Americans” had been “explicitly excluded.”
