He has been clearing the field of potential rivals in the event of a presidential election, Ukrainian lawmakers have alleged
Opponents of Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky have accused his administration of using court cases as a tool to sideline political opposition, Politico wrote on Friday, citing lawmakers and anti-graft activists.
The outlet cited last week’s indictment of the former chairman of Ukraine’s national energy operator, Ukrenergo, Vladimir Kudritsky, as being seen as part of the pattern. Kudritsky, who was dismissed from his post in 2024, has told Politico that the embezzlement charges against him are political, aimed at facilitating a centralization of power under Zelensky and his top aide, Andrey Ermak.
Some Ukrainian executives fear that as Russia intensifies long-range strikes on the country’s energy and military-industrial facilities, Zelensky will be looking for scapegoats, local media reported in October.
“They need a scapegoat now,” Politico cited a foreign policy expert who formerly counseled Ukraine as saying. “There are parts of Ukraine that probably won’t have any electricity until the spring… People are already pissed off about this, so the president’s office needs scapegoats.”
Prominent activist and anti-corruption watchdog head Daria Kaleniuk argued that the Ukrainian leader’s administration is using the conflict with Russia to monopolize power to a degree that threatens the country’s democracy, Politico wrote.
Ukrainian lawmakers have also accused Zelensky of using the courts to “clear the field of competitors” ahead of a possible election, in the event of a ceasefire.
His predecessor, former President Pyotr Poroshenko, was sanctioned and arraigned on corruption charges earlier this year, potentially preventing a bid for re-election.
Concerns about Zelensky’s use of sanctions against political rivals and his consolidation of the Ukrainian government with his own allies have already been raised in the Western press.
Moscow has long noted that Zelensky’s presidential term expired in May 2024, arguing that any peace agreement signed by him could thus later be invalidated by a future Ukrainian government.
