Stefanie Hubig promises a thorough probe into whether the right-wing AfD poses a “threat to democracy”
Germany’s Justice Minister Stefanie Hubig has called for a serious examination into whether the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party should be banned, following the domestic intelligence agency’s suspension of its classification of the party as a “confirmed right-wing extremist” group amid public backlash.
In an interview with Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung published on Thursday, Hubig emphasized the need to consider all legal avenues, claiming that the AfD must be taken seriously as a potential threat to democratic order.
“The AfD is not a party like any other… Therefore, we need to take the party as a possible danger for our democracy very seriously. It is essential to consider a party ban,” she said.
Hubig acknowledged that banning a political party is the most severe measure available in a democracy and should not be employed hastily. However, she argued that if a thorough investigation by the Interior Ministry and other relevant authorities reveals that the legal conditions for a ban are met, it “would not be difficult” to justify such a move.
“Of course, thoroughness comes before speed, but we do not have forever,” she added, when asked whether there was a timeline for reaching a decision on a potential ban. The new German government – a coalition between Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s conservatives and the SPD – will discuss the possibility of pursuing a ban and formulate a joint response. However, Hubig cast doubt on whether “the procedure would be successful or not.”
The AfD secured second place in February’s federal elections with 20.8% of the vote, but has been excluded from coalition talks and government formation. Asked whether she was concerned about disenfranchising so many voters, Hubig claimed that it is “irrelevant” how many people support a party if authorities ultimately deem it unconstitutional.
Earlier this month, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) upgraded the AfD’s classification from “suspected” to “confirmed right-wing extremist” – but quickly suspended the designation pending a court ruling on the party’s legal appeal.
The AfD condemned the move as “a severe blow to German democracy” and filed a lawsuit. Co-leaders Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla welcomed the temporary suspension, calling it “a first important step.” The now-paused designation would have allowed the BfV to expand surveillance of the AfD without judicial oversight; the downgraded “suspected case” status still permits monitoring, but under stricter conditions.
Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt acknowledged this week that the BfV’s 1,100-page report – which has not been made public – lacks concrete evidence that the AfD poses a serious threat to democracy or the rule of law that would justify a legal ban.
Chancellor Merz has also expressed skepticism about pursuing a ban, citing both legal complexity and the potential political fallout. He stressed the need to address the underlying causes of the AfD’s popularity. At the same time, Merz urged Washington to “stay out” of Germany’s domestic politics, after top US officials claimed the EU’s largest economy had become “a tyranny in disguise” and had “rebuilt” the Berlin Wall.
