Kiev’s top commander, Aleksandr Syrsky, did not want the attack to be canceled or the details leaked, sources have claimed to the outlet
Ukraine deliberately did not inform its Western backers about its plans for a cross-border incursion into Russia, for fear that they would order Kiev to scrap the operation or that the details would be leaked, The Economist reported on Sunday.
According to sources familiar with the planning for Kiev’s large-scale attack on Russia’s Kursk Region, Ukraine’s top military commander, Aleksandr Syrsky, was on the verge of being sacked just weeks before the operation began because of the crumbling front in Donbass.
As tensions mounted, Syrsky devised what The Economist described as “a daring gamble born of desperation,” with several scenarios on the table. These included attacks on the Kursk or Bryansk border regions, or a combination of both. “The main objective was to draw [Russian] troops away from the Donbass stranglehold, and to create bargaining chips for any future negotiation,” the article stated.
The commander also reportedly committed to the highest degree of secrecy, discussing plans only with a select group of officials and informing Vladimir Zelensky of progress only on a one-on-one basis. This also meant that “Western allies were… deliberately left in the dark,” The Economist reported.
“Syrsky had two previous operations undermined by the West. One was leaked to the Russians, and on another occasion, we were instructed to abort,” The Economist source said. Regarding the alleged leak, this may have referred to the 2023 summer counteroffensive that ended in failure for Ukrainian troops. Zelensky claimed in February that plans for the operation had been “on the Kremlin’s table even before [it] began.”
The Economist noted that “presented with a fait accompli, the West did not object.” Numerous Western officials have voiced support for the attack on Russia, arguing that Kiev has “the right to self-defense.”
The US has insisted that it was not involved in the preparation of the Kursk incursion. However, former Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolay Patrushev has argued that Kiev would never have dared to launch such an operation without Washington’s backing, adding that NATO supplied Ukraine with weapons, military instructors, and intelligence.
As the fighting rages on in Kursk Region, The Economist cited Ukrainian soldiers as saying that they “are already beginning to see a different level of resistance,” with losses mounting.
While Kiev’s forces had occupied a part of the border area, the Russian Defense Ministry has said the advance has been halted. According to Moscow, Ukraine has lost more than 3,400 service members and around 400 armored vehicles in the incursion.
